Environment groups welcome Gunns’ frank assessment on native forests

Posted: 10 September 2010 in Gunns, New pulp mills

The long running saga of Gunns‘ proposed pulp mill continues. Yesterday, the company’s new chief executive, Greg L’Estrange, announced that Gunns would stop logging native forests:

“This may well mean transitioning to plantations. But move we must for the conflict must end for too many people have been financially and emotionally injured in the Australian forest wars.

The announcement that Gunns will stop logging native forests is good news, welcomed by the Wilderness Society, the Australian Conservation Foundation and Environment Tasmania (see press release, below). But this does not mean a stop to the plans for a new pulp mill. And a vast area of industrial tree plantations feeding a polluting pulp mill is not good news. In 2009, Gunns took over eight Great Southern plantation schemes in Victoria and South Australia after Great Southern went bust.

Media Release 10 Sept 2010

Environment groups welcome Gunns’ frank assessment on native forests

The Wilderness Society, the Australian Conservation Foundation and Environment Tasmania welcomed the long awaited announcement by the Chief Executive of Gunns to move out of native forest logging and work with the community and conservation groups to “find joint solutions to age-old conflicts and move beyond [to] a real, sustainable forest industry”. These comments forecast a change in direction to the long running conflict over forestry in Tasmania.

The Wilderness Society spokesperson Paul Oosting said “Community and environment groups working for decades for the protection of Tasmania’s irreplaceable native forests see Gunns announcement as a very welcome breakthrough. We look forward to protecting Tasmania’s forests and supporting new lasting jobs by continuing to work with the timber industry to pave a way forward.”

Environment Tasmania, The Wilderness Society and the Australian Conservation Foundation are engaged in talks with forestry industry representatives on options for the protection of native forests, the creation of a sustainable timber industry and the delivery of an end to the decades-long forest conflict. If groups can reach an agreement over principles, then they would seek government support for a broad process to involve stakeholders and the broader community in the development and delivery of a solution.

Environment Tasmania Director Dr Phill Pullinger also welcomed Gunns’ shift. “We now have the best opportunity in decades to resolve the forest conflict in Tasmania. It is vitally important for Tasmania’s future that we protect our native forests, create a timber industry that Tasmanians can be proud of, and heal the deep divisions in our community. We have to find a solution to the conflict over forestry that is durable, lasting and involves the whole Tasmanian community,” he said.

“If Gunns moves out of native forest logging and concentrates on processing its plantations, it will protect jobs in the timber industry,” said Lindsay Hesketh, National Forest Campaigner for the Australian Conservation Foundation.

“It’s time to look at forests in Tasmania in a new way because the old way – a battle between jobs and forests – has protected neither. It ruptured the community, failed to protect jobs and destroyed Tasmanian’s natural heritage.

“We encourage all players to continue dialogue to find common ground on these important issues,” Mr Hesketh said.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Karl Stevens says:

    Hi Chris. I got here through your work on the Brazilian pulp mills at ‘pulp mill watch’. I’m a part of the Tamar Valley opposition to Gunns pulp mill. Most of us don’t agree with the version of events in that media release. The Wilderness Society and Environment Tasmania seem to be getting a choice from the logging industry. Agree to a pulp mill in return for an end to logging high conservation forests. As you know this is a 1.1 million tonne capacity pulp mill in a plantation estate of 200,000 hectares of eucalypt. Gunns claim they will ship in about 2 million tonnes of wood chips per year. The question I’m asking is ‘how will they compete with the massive Brazilian and Asian pulp mills coming online’? This is not a 3rd World country. We have high wages and costs. It doesn’t make economic sense to me. Cheers and keep up the great work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s